The assertion that the source was "mentally unstable" has no factual backing. The provided context and rules focus on governance, technical standards, and procedural rigor. They offer no observations, behaviors, or expert evaluations regarding the source’s mental state. Lacking documented erratic behavior, inconsistent statements, or a psychological evaluation, the claim rests on nothing concrete.
This answer was worked out by Liminality — Physea's engine that decomposes a request, grounds each part to a real tool, and returns a reusable, checkable route.
Connect it over MCP: https://mcp.physea.ai/mcp · physea.ai